Map the code.
Explore dependencies, interfaces and important workflows. Check the generated explanation against running behaviour and the people who use the system.
Use AI to investigate an existing codebase and prepare focused changes. Keep architecture, review and release decisions with experienced engineers.
Explore the capabilityBefore rewriting a system, understand its dependencies, behaviour and business constraints. AI can assist the investigation; it does not remove the need to validate what it finds.
Explore dependencies, interfaces and important workflows. Check the generated explanation against running behaviour and the people who use the system.
Capture existing behaviour and identify gaps. Test changes in an isolated branch or environment, with secrets and production access restricted.
Inspect generated code, test security and regressions, and deploy in controlled increments. Keep a practical rollback route.
Investigate an undocumented integration, add regression tests and prepare a narrow change for review.
Generated code can be plausible and wrong. Faster output is not a substitute for a correct change or a maintainable system.
No. It gives engineers another tool for investigation and implementation. The engineering decisions and accountability remain with people.
Only with a clear reason. Improving interfaces, tests or a single troublesome component may be more valuable and less disruptive.
Technical reference: OpenAI: Codex workflows (opens in a new tab)