Investigate the gaps.
Map the data path, model calls, permissions and dependencies. Agree the actual requirements and success criteria.
Review an existing prototype and close the gaps that matter: identity, integration, testing, monitoring and operational ownership.
Explore the capabilityUnderstand what exists before prescribing a replacement. The useful work may be a stronger interface, better tests or one missing control, rather than a new technology stack.
Map the data path, model calls, permissions and dependencies. Agree the actual requirements and success criteria.
Fix the critical failure modes, automate deployment and add appropriate controls. Make the behaviour observable.
Validate the workflow with representative users and test recovery. Agree ownership, documentation and the route into support.
Retain a working retrieval prototype while rebuilding its permission checks and adding a regression test suite.
A prototype demonstrates an idea, not all the requirements of a production service. Scope the missing work before promising a release date.
Yes. Access, documentation and a clear review scope help establish the starting point.
Not by default. Preserve useful work and explain any proposed replacement against the risks and requirements.
Technical reference: Anthropic: evaluating AI agents (opens in a new tab)