Define the job.
Agree the objective, inputs, permitted tools and completion criteria. Decide which decisions remain with a person.
Agents that retrieve information, use tools and carry out multi-step work. Built around a bounded task, explicit permissions and a way to check the result.
Explore the capabilityA predictable workflow may need very little autonomy. More open-ended work needs tighter evaluation, execution limits and supervision. Start with what the task actually requires.
Agree the objective, inputs, permitted tools and completion criteria. Decide which decisions remain with a person.
Integrate data and applications. Design state, validation and retries around the workflow, not around a chat transcript.
Exercise denied access, contradictory evidence, tool errors and interrupted work. Measure completion and the quality of the action.
Prepare an operational request from approved information, validate the fields and pause for authorisation.
Use the least autonomy needed. More agents, more tools or longer prompts do not automatically produce a better system.
Yes. A bounded, measurable workflow makes it easier to assess value, risks and integration effort.
Where the task requires it. Approval, exception handling and operational ownership should be defined before the system is used.
Technical reference: Anthropic: evaluating AI agents (opens in a new tab)